Experiment: The Dumb Jock

There were two congregations in their experiment. The observational group was exposed to hints of electronegative stereotypes through a questionnaire before the examination bit the control was exposed to the negative stereotypes after the test. The questionnaire brought to their attention the possibility that they may have been given special treatment and considerations due to the fact that they atomic number 18 athletes. Somehow, the experiment proved that there is a negative correlation amongst the exposure of the athletes to negative stereotypes and their performance in taking tests.More exposure to negative stereotypes brought lower scores eon less exposure to these stereotypes brought high schooler scores. For the experimental group, it is possible that answering the questionnaire that exposed them to the muted Jock stereotype displace their self-regard that led them to getting low test results. The questionnaire gave them the subject that they be only accepted in t he university because of their athletic skills and not because of their academic skills.With this kindly of thinking, they might have exerted less effort in nswering the questions of the test because they do not believe that they will get a high grade. He might probably think that the societys expectations regarding his test scores wont be high and that he, himself, is led to believe that he is accepted in the university as an athlete rather than a student. Similar to the placebo effect, the subject immerses himself to the popular belief and conceit of a dumb Jock that might have led him to die the test unconsciously when he was given the idea through the questionnaire.The dumb Jock stereotype probably started when the people performing well in thletics discovered to be less educated because they spend most of their time honing their athletic abilities rather than their mental abilities. Because of this, people expected less from these athletes and these athletes tend to stri ng up unto mediocrity and expect special considerations because of their situation. I think the athletes, themselves, try to start their description to the societys norms. This observation came from years of experience in an NCAA school where a large portion of the population is comprised of athletes.Although IVe seen some who perform well n academics and athletics, it cannot be denied that there ar lots of student-athletes who refuse to exert more than effort into their academics simply because they think it is not expected of them to do so. In my past school, they nave tried to explain to us now there are several kinds ot smarts and that each and every one of us simply has our let fortes. I think that whats all-important(prenominal) is that they are reminded that they are good students who happen to play for the school and not athletes who are required to study while they play.Not only does this straighten their focus, but they are also given the idea that they are accepted a s a student not as an athlete. There were instances wherein prestigious schools rejected great athletes not because they werent good bounteous in their field of sports but because they werent able to pass the entrance examination. It is important for them to know that they are in their position not entirely because of their athletic prowess but because they are students first and that representing the school comes second.