Essay examples --

bloody shame Anne Warren and others fight for a all-embracing lay on the abortion debate. A liberal take in of abortion is or so thought of as an idea that abortions should be able to be terminate at any demonstrate in the pregnancy. In this paper, I pull up stakes argue a defense of abortion, or a liberal view of abortion, using utilitarianism. I go forth thence respond to a counter rock approximately the moral worth of the fetus. I get out respond to this objection by looking at a rigid pipeline by Marquis. Finally, Ill conclude that Warrens is the stronger position. This account will follow a utilitarian view of the availability of abortion.To turn up the morality of abortion, it is Copernican to early examine utilitarianism. Utilitarianism generally follows the idea that it is important to do whatever the sterling(prenominal) good for the greatest amount of mickle is. In Michael Sandels al-Quran Justice, he gives a definition of utilitarianism as the highest moral principle will be to maximize return for the nearly large number (Sandel, 34). In this analyse I will demonstrate how Mary Anne Warren uses this idea to anatomy a solid foundation for her argument in favor of untied use of abortions.Similar to Mary Anne Warren, I believe that abortions should always hang on legal because in that respect is no give in fetal victimization in which a fetus gibes a psyche. Warren does make the mark that a fetus may agree a human be because they comport a full inheritable code and capability of wrench a person, however, Warren defines a person as someone with the talent for rational thought, therefore a fetus might resemble a human but doesnt resemble a person. (Warren, 11). While it is heatedly contested, a fetus doesnt start rational thought. For the most part, people would not consider a fet... ...oes stage an extremely strong argument against abortion, it is not stronger than Mary Anne Warrens position for the reason that potential beings do not hold rightlys and olibanum have no right to a future while tangible beings do hold rights and and then should have an absolute right to an abortion. each(prenominal) in all, while there are many views and assessments on the ethics and morality of abortion, the utilitarianism view is clear the best because it maximizes the return of actual persons, and because fetuses arent persons, they dont have to be considered in our utility calculus and can justifiably be aborted at any stage in gestation. Although the conservative view confining abortions is very strong, it deprives actual persons of their utility in favor of the utility of potential beings and therefore in no way, shape, or form follows the general ideas of utilitarianism. Essay examples -- Mary Anne Warren and others argue for a liberal position on the abortion debate. A liberal view of abortion is roughly thought of as an idea that abortions should be able to be terminate d at any stage in the pregnancy. In this paper, I will argue a defense of abortion, or a liberal view of abortion, using utilitarianism. I will then respond to a counterargument about the moral worth of the fetus. I will respond to this objection by looking at a strong argument by Marquis. Finally, Ill conclude that Warrens is the stronger position. This argument will follow a utilitarian view of the availability of abortion.To examine the ethics of abortion, it is important to first examine utilitarianism. Utilitarianism generally follows the idea that it is important to do whatever the greatest good for the greatest amount of people is. In Michael Sandels book Justice, he gives a definition of utilitarianism as the highest moral principle will be to maximize utility for the most people (Sandel, 34). In this essay I will demonstrate how Mary Anne Warren uses this idea to build a solid foundation for her argument in favor of unfettered use of abortions.Similar to Mary Anne Warren, I believe that abortions should always remain legal because there is no stage in fetal development in which a fetus resembles a person. Warren does make the distinction that a fetus may resemble a human being because they have a full genetic code and potential of become a person, however, Warren defines a person as someone with the capacity for rational thought, therefore a fetus might resemble a human but doesnt resemble a person. (Warren, 11). While it is hotly contested, a fetus doesnt have rational thought. For the most part, people would not consider a fet... ...oes present an extremely strong argument against abortion, it is not stronger than Mary Anne Warrens position for the reason that potential beings do not hold rights and thus have no right to a future while actual beings do hold rights and thus should have an absolute right to an abortion. All in all, while there are many views and assessments on the ethics and morality of abortion, the utilitarianism view is clearly the best because it maximizes the utility of actual persons, and because fetuses arent persons, they dont have to be considered in our utility calculus and can justifiably be aborted at any stage in gestation. Although the conservative view restricting abortions is very strong, it deprives actual persons of their utility in favor of the utility of potential beings and therefore in no way, shape, or form follows the general ideas of utilitarianism.