Public Policy Essay

Public Administration alship fannyal demands championship for various aspects throughout many realms. From grants to sidewalk amelio prize to going light-green in residential homes to starting up a business and educational grants. There are in like manner, as we are currently seeing, monies coming from the national government for stimulus payments to US citizens and as proposed by our late chairwoman Elect Obama there are policies in the making for a invariable stimulus or revenue enhancement rebate due to excessive anele prices and changes in healthcare. The one thing with the majority of the monies being spoken of is that so untold comes from the national government. This precludes any monies the pleads may fuck rancid or have already spent, as in the end they also receive monies from federal official official agencies.So here we see a vicious circle of entirely these people needing money for one reason or another, they spend what they have, feed for grants from the federal government, the federal government says hey ok tho in the end, what do we do when the federal government runs out of money? What do evokes do when there is no money left over(p) to be tapped? Do they quaint at another plane section because that de give outment may have the monies to retain further?Let us start with the liquor tax. Currently the tax goes like this the federal government gets approximately 10% of each gal depending on the proof or volume manufactured (each state seems to vary) of the alcohol. The high the proof, the more the taxes they receive. The state on the other hand receives a much higher revenue from the tax (State Liquor Tax Rates-2008). Each state has different programs in which the taxes collected helps finance. The federal government should take however a specified amount, a flat tax from each state for both alcohol and tobacco and keep tally on which states they grasp these taxes from and howmuch. When these individual states run out of their own taxed revenue then when they practice for a grant, the grant acceptance and money distribution is then taken from the coffers of the federal government establish upon the taxes already received into the hands of the federal government. This keeps those federal tax dollars focused in one area rather of spread all over the board. If states run out of money from the federal government through this specified mean then the balloting of measures communicate for the public in general to vote on a new tax for this reason, should be implemented.Some states have public lottery games or gambling which is allowed in public places, of course with age allowances in place. The federal government has their hands in this pie as well. I believe that the federal government should step away and not collect taxes on this leave off maybe through an individual tax return, and allow the states to keep and observe this taxation as sole entities with a fiscal report as to where these tax dollars are spent. In addition, taxes collected on gambling should be distributed to the same entities each yr without prevail or each division change their entities of who these taxes go to, to help finance. This would be akin to alternating weekends of run for in the general public forum.Let us go a bit more local. Each county has their county has their own form of taxation and ways to obtain revenue. These counties should work together more as a team than what they currently do. Instead of them allocating their funds to only the departments within (i.e. city tax on water only for water line improvement) they should all syndicate their monies together. Thereshould be a strict fiscal plan in place that determines how much money goes where and for what. Each department of the county should be make each year to make an honest analysis of what they will need to further any improvements that are necessary and not frivolous and based upon that information, this will determine what de partments get what. Maybe the courthouse has an upcoming need to repair a bathroom where as the dump wants a wall some their facility to improve aesthic purposes. Which is more important? This should be obvious. What if the county sheriffs department needs to have additional law enforcement but has a want of cars? Instead of being allowed to buy the new cars each year, cut the rate of cars bought in half and put both people to each car. This may only mean the savings from not buying 2 or 3 cars but each dollar helps.In the end, the county has a plump record of where all the money goes to and they have all worked together as a team and not against each other due to political science and there may also be more money left over at the end of each year which will emphatically lessen the amount of money asked for from the federal government.Healthcare is a striking issue. Public policy should simply enforce specific financial capping rules as to what the healthcare industry can cha rge for their costs, this is to include doctors and providers of amends alike. If these two entities can work together as a team regarding services, payments and insurance under more strict federal guidelines of what can be aerated for these instances, then this would make these two entities work more closely together. all told in all, each department of each state, county and city that implements a tax, part of each department should also allocate a small helping of the tax revenue to a general fund for emergencies or spiritual world departments that may suddenly need additional fund. This General fund should also be exhausted before applying for federal grants.Some may choose this a socialistic view regarding public administration and maybe it is, but if so then take a look into Canadas or Europes socialization and compare these two to the country of America. Which one is better off in the long run. If you can determine that (and it isnt the USA) then you can determine that the y are doing something more correct.